Friday, June 27, 2014

Chevrolet Pontiac Brake Problems

Increased resistance in the Body Control Module (BCM) connection may result in voltage fluctuations in the Brake Apply Sensor (BAS) circuit.  These fluctuations can cause one or more of these conditions: the brake lights to illuminate without the brake pedal being pushed; the brake lights to not illuminate when the pedal is pushed; difficulty disengaging the cruise control; moving the gear shifter out of the ‘PARK’ position without pushing the brake; and disablement of crash avoidance features such as traction control, electronic stability control, and panic braking assist features.  Any of these failed conditions increases the likelihood of a crash.

Here are some typical complaints.

Manufacturer: Chevrolet, General Motors LLC

Vehicle Identification No. (VIN): 1G2AL15F977...

SUMMARY:
TL- THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 PONTIAC G5. THE CONTACT STATED THAT AFTER A RECALL REPAIR NHTSA CAMPAIGN NUMBER: 14V171000 COMPONENT(S): ELECTRICAL SYSTEM. THE STEERING COLUMN WAS SHAKING VIOLENTLY AND HARD TO TURN. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A DEALER WHERE THE TECHNICIAN DIAGNOSED THE INNER STEERING SHAFT IS BINDING AND IS CAUSING THE SHAKING. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE CURRENT AND FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 45,000. SR
 
                                                
Date Complaint Filed: 05/07/2014
Component(s): SEAT BELTS , STEERING
Date of Incident: 03/03/2014
NHTSA ID Number: 10587007
                            
          
Date Complaint Filed: 04/28/2014
Component(s): STEERING
Date of Incident: 04/23/2014
NHTSA ID Number: 10585344
                           
      

Date Complaint Filed: 03/24/2014
Component(s): AIR BAGS , ELECTRICAL SYSTEM , SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC , STEERING
Date of Incident: 03/03/2014
NHTSA ID Number: 10575580

        


Date Complaint Filed: 02/26/2014
Component(s): ELECTRICAL SYSTEM , ENGINE , STEERING
Date of Incident: 11/09/2011
NHTSA ID Number: 10566107    
 

Date Complaint Filed: 02/03/2014
Component(s): ELECTRICAL SYSTEM , STEERING
Date of Incident: 07/01/2010
NHTSA ID Number: 10562768
                            
         

Date Complaint Filed: 11/12/2013
Component(s): STEERING
Date of Incident: 11/11/2013
NHTSA ID Number: 10552011
                            
          
Date Complaint Filed: 02/16/2011
Component(s): ELECTRICAL SYSTEM , FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE , STEERING
Date of Incident: 01/18/2011
NHTSA ID Number: 10383792
                            
          

Details close

0 Associated Documents


Date Complaint Filed: 12/27/2010
Component(s): STEERING
Date of Incident: 09/13/2010
NHTSA ID Number: 10372525

All Products Associated with this Complaint expand

 

Date Complaint Filed: 10/01/2010
Component(s): STEERING
Date of Incident: 12/13/2009
NHTSA ID Number: 10358770
                           
     

 
Posted by at No comments:

Ford Escape and Vision Problems

 

 

There have multiple reports of serious engine problems on the Ford Escape and Ford Fusion vehicle.  Reports have indicated that engines in the vehicles may possibly overheat and cause fluid leaks. In turn, leaking fluid may land on hot exhaust systems, which may cause a fire. The affected 2013 Escape vehicles were manufactured from October 5, 2011 through November 26, 2012 and are equipped with 1.6L engines. The 2013 Fusion vehicles with 1.6L engines were manufactured from February 3, 2012 through November 29, 2012.

 
1. Recall and NHTSA Investigation

RECALL Subject : Reduced Steering Control

Report Receipt Date: MAY 31, 2013
NHTSA Campaign Number: 13V232000
Component(s): STEERING

All Products Associated with this Recall expand

  • FORD FUSION2013

Manufacturer: Ford Motor Company

SUMMARY:

Ford is recalling certain model year 2013 Fusion vehicles manufactured April 19, 2013, through April 23, 2013. The steering gears may be missing an internal retaining clip. If the clip is missing, components inside the steering gear may become dislodged inside the gear assembly.

CONSEQUENCE:

This could result in impaired steering, including the loss of steering control, increasing the risk of a crash.

REMEDY:

Ford will notify owners, and dealers will replace the steering gear, free of charge. The recall began on June 17, 2013. Ford's recall number is 13S06. Owners may contact the Ford customer relationship center at 1-866-436-7332.

NOTES:

Owners may also contact the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Vehicle Safety Hotline at 1-888-327-4236 (TTY 1-800-424-9153), or go to www.safercar.gov.

Date Investigation Opened: FEB 21, 2013
Date Investigation Closed: FEB 28, 2014
NHTSA Action Number: PE13003
Component(s): ENGINE

All Products Associated with this Investigation expand

Vehicle MakeModelModel Year(s)

  • FORDESCAPE2009-2012
  • FORDFUSION2010-2013
  • MERCURYMARINER2009-2011
  • MERCURYMILAN2010-2011

Details close

47 Associated Documents expand

Manufacturer: Ford Motor Company

SUMMARY:

On February 21, 2013, the Office of Defects Investigations (ODI) opened Preliminary Evaluation PE13-003 to investigate allegations of electronic throttle body (ETB) failures resulting in sudden reduction of engine power in model year (MY) 2009-2013 Ford Escape, Fusion, Mariner and Milan vehicles. During this investigation, Ford identified a condition in subject vehicles equipped with 2.5L and 3.0L engines that may result in a sudden reduction of engine power. According to Ford, the ETB internal motor contacts may develop a high resistance material buildup condition on the commutator, resulting in intermittent electrical connectivity and reduced engine power. When this condition occurs, the Malfunction Indicator Lamp (MIL) or Wrench light will illuminate and the vehicle may enter a limited limp home mode. Ford?s trade name for the feature is Failure Mode Effects Management (FMEM) mode. In this mode, engine power and vehicle speed are reduced, while full function of the power steering, power braking, lighting, and climate control systems are maintained. ODI?s complaint analysis indicate that the predominant failure mode involved reduced motive power associated with the limited limp home mode with engine speeds limited to approximately 900 RPM. Analysis of warranty claims provided by Ford identified 59,807 claims related to ETB replacements and approximately 50 percent of claims are associated with diagnostic trouble codes (DTC) P2111, "Throttle Body Stuck Open", and P2112, "Throttle Body Stuck Closed". Ford described several factors where the ETB motor may fail resulting in DTCs P2111 or P2112 but the failure is not an existing stuck open or closed ETB valve position. According to Ford, the ETB control strategy provides the driver with three FMEM modes that allow varying degrees of vehicle mobility depending on the severity of the fault detected. DTCs associated with stuck open or closed throttle valves are designated the highest failure severity resulting in engine speeds limited to high idle corresponding to the limited limp home mode. Vehicles are not likely to unexpectedly stall as a result of this condition, but drivers may characterize the reduced functionality as a stall, even though their vehicle may still has motive capability. Other FMEM limp modes may result in reduced engine performance but will maintain vehicle speed above 20mph. During this investigation, Ford and its suppliers, Delphi and Igarashi, updated the powertrain control module (PCM) software to include a throttle body motor cleaning cycle during key-on and modified the ETB internal motor components design, surface finish and material composition to improve durability. Additionally, Ford developed a remedy procedure and issued a special Customer Satisfaction Program (CSP) 13N03 extending the ETB warranty coverage and instructing dealers to update the powertrain calibration to improve vehicle performance in the event that intermittent electrical connectivity of the throttle body motor contacts occurs. The program extends the coverage for up to 10 years of service or 150,000 miles from the warranty start date of the vehicle, all vehicles are eligible for the program through January 31, 2015 regardless of mileage. Owners of the affected vehicles will be contacted by mail to take their vehicle to a Ford dealer who will reprogram the PCM to the latest calibration. The bulletin was sent to dealers on January 17, 2014 and the owner letter mailing began on January 27, 2014. See the investigative file for copies of Ford's bulletin and owner letter. This preliminary evaluation is closed. The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding that a safety-related defect does not exist. For additional information regarding this investigation, see complete closing resume in the document file for PE13-003.
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,

Tuesday, June 10, 2014

Porsche Cayenne Class Action



A class action alleges defects in the Porsche Cayenne.

According to the claim, each individual plaintiff asserts that he or she purchased a Cayenne that came equipped with plastic coolant tubes.[1] Plaintiffs assert that such tubes cracked, leaked, or otherwise failed and that, in 813*813 some cases, the tubes leaked and caused damage to other parts of the engine. When Plaintiffs attempted to repair or replace the coolant tubes, they allegedly learned that Porsche did not offer replacement plastic tubes but instead offered an "OEM update kit" that contained aluminum coolant pipes and cost "at least $1,500 to $3,600 per vehicle" to purchase and install. 

Plaintiffs allege that Defendants defectively designed the Cayenne by equipping it with plastic coolant tubes instead of aluminum pipes. Plaintiffs argue that the Cayenne's coolant system is defective because coolant tubes are exposed to extreme heat and that, as a result of such exposure, coolant tubes made of plastic will crack and degrade. Plaintiffs add that "most high-end performance vehicles with powerful engines use aluminum pipes to transport the coolant" and that the "extent of wear and tear on the Cayenne's plastic valley coolant tubes is entirely disproportionate to the age of these vehicles."  Plaintiffs also allege that the use of plastic coolant tubes "implicates serious safety concerns.

Plaintiffs assert that Defendants knew, reasonably should have known, or were reckless in not knowing about the coolant tube defect but failed to disclose the defect to consumers. Defendants allegedly had or should have had this knowledge "based on, among other things, widespread customer complaints of prematurely cracking coolant tubes, dealer inquiries, repair shop inquiries, dealer-provided repair data, the high volume of replacement parts being ordered, and [National Highway Traffic Safety Administration] complaints." (Id. ¶ 63.) Plaintiffs assert that, despite this alleged knowledge, Defendants promoted the Cayenne's cooling system and made misrepresentations such as "`[t]he entire cooling system is specifically designed for prolonged heavy-duty operation.'"

Free Consultation on Porsche defect claims
Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)