Monday, December 16, 2013

Ford F150 Acceleration Problem


 

 

 

 

 

The NHTSA is investigating complaints of sharp reducti acceleration issues and loss of power for owners of 2011-2013 Ford F-150 trucks with the 3.5L GTDI engine. This engine is the V-6 EcoBoost engine.  


Date Complaint Filed: 12/10/2013

Component(s): UNKNOWN OR OTHER

Date of Incident: 08/14/2012

NHTSA Number: 10555429

FORD F-150 2012 

Manufacturer: Ford Motor Company

Vehicle Identification No. (VIN):  1FTFW1ET9CF...

SUMMARY:

ON THREE DIFFERENT OCCASIONS WAS IN THE PROCESS OF PASSING A VEHICLE, AND ALL OF A SUDDEN LOST ENGINE ACCELERATION, PICK UP BEGAN TO VIBRATE, PULLED OVER AND CALLED SERVICE CENTER, WAS TOLD TO TURN OFF AND RESTART VEHICLE, PROCEEDED TO DESTINATION!

Date Complaint Filed: 12/08/2013

Component(s): ENGINE

Date of Incident: 11/11/2013

NHTSA ID Number: 10555212

Vehicle Make Model Model Year(s)

•FORD F-150 2013                      

 Manufacturer: Ford Motor Company

Vehicle Identification No. (VIN):  1FTFW1ET8CF...

SUMMARY:

UPON ACCELERATION TO PASS ON FREEWAY, ENGINE SHUDDERS AND LOSES POWER. TRANSMISSION DOWN SHIFTED TO TRY TO RECOVER, BUT ENGINE WOULD NOT RESPOND TO THROTTLE PRESS. HAD TO BACK OFF ON THROTTLE AND MOVE TO RIGHT LANE ALL THE WHILE THINKING TO TAKE THE TRUCK TO THE SHOULDER. VERY SCARY WHEN TRYING TO PASS AND NO POWER. LUCKILY I WAS NOT REAR ENDED FOR SLOWING DOWN SO FAST!

Complaint Filed: 12/03/2013

Component(s): ENGINE , POWER TRAIN

Date of Incident: 02/01/2012

NHTSA ID Number: 10554605            

Vehicle Make Model Model Year(s)

FORDF-1502011

Manufacturer: Ford Motor Company

Vehicle Identification No. (VIN):  1FTFW1ET0BF...

SUMMARY:

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 FORD F-150. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING AT APPROXIMATELY 55 MPH, THE ACCELERATOR FAILED TO RESPOND TO ACCELERATION ATTEMPTS. ADDITIONALLY, AN ERROR CODE (P0036) AND THE CHECK ENGINE WARNING LIGHT ILLUMINATED. THE CONTACT ALSO MENTIONED THAT THE VEHICLE FAILED TO OPERATE NORMALLY WHEN DRIVING IN RAINY WEATHER. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A DEALER BUT WAS NOT ABLE TO BE DIAGNOSED. THE TECHNICIAN WAS UNABLE TO DETERMINE THE CAUSE OF THE FAILURE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 3,500. 

Date Complaint Filed: 12/03/2013

Component(s): ENGINE

Date of Incident: 08/02/2010

NHTSA ID Number: 10554601       

Vehicle Make Model Model Year Ford F150 Acceleration issues

FORD F-150 2011

 Manufacturer: Ford Motor Company

 Vehicle Identification No. (VIN):  1FTFW1ET4BF...

SUMMARY:

SOMETIMES WHEN I TRY TO PASS THE ENGINE DURING FULL ACCELERATION STUMBLES AND LOOSES ACCELERATION. IT DOES NOT HAPPEN ALL THE TIME AND DOES NOT

Friday, December 6, 2013

Kia Sedona brake, suspension and electronic stability problems

 Owners of the Kia Sedona have had brake, suspension and stability problems and may be  entitled to compensation.  Enclosed are reports.  


 

Date of Complaint: 08/29/2011

Component(s): Brakes, Electronic Stability Control, Parking Brake, Indicator Light, Air Disc Rotor 

Vehicle Make Model, Model Year(s) KIA SEDONA 2006 

Manufacturer: Kia Motors Corporation

Vehicle Identification No. (VIN): Sedona 6-cyl 

Summary:

The contact stated that when the brake was applied, the vehicle would shake violently. The vehicle was taken to the dealer several times for the failure. The dealer replaced the rotors, but the failure was not corrected. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure and advised the contact to take the vehicle back to the dealer. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure mileage was 50,000 and the current mileage was 80,000. (View at http://www.carcomplaints.com/Kia/Sedona/2006/brakes/service_brakes_hydraulic.shtml#12)

Date of Complaint: 09/01/2013

Component(s): Brakes, Electronic Stability Control, Parking Brake, Indicator Light, Air Disc Rotor

Vehicle Make Model, Model Year(s) “KIA SEDONA 2006”

Manufacturer: Kia Motors Corporation

Vehicle Identification No. (VIN): Sedona

Summary:

The contact stated that the air bag and esc warning lights illuminated. The vehicle was taken to the dealer for diagnosis. The technician stated that the computer in the front driver or passenger's side seat would have to be replaced. The technician was unable to guarantee the repair after replacing the part. The vehicle was not repaired. The VIN was not available. The approximate failure mileage was 60,000. (View at http://www.carcomplaints.com/Kia/Sedona/2006/brakes/electronic_stability_control.shtml#8)

Date of Complaint: 06/22/2007

Component(s): Brakes, Electronic Stability Control, Parking Brake, Indicator Light, Air Disc Rotor

Vehicle Make Model, Model Year(s) “KIA SEDONA 2006”

Manufacturer: Kia Motors Corporation

Vehicle Identification No. (VIN): Sedona 6-cyl

Summary:

While driving 75 mph, the entire steering column shook when the contact applied the brakes. He pulled off the freeway and noticed the front wheel rims were extremely hot. He waited for them to cool off and drove home. The vehicle operates normally when driving 40-55 mph. The dealer stated that the rotors may be bent or warped. The VIN was unavailable. The current mileage is 15,000 and failure mileage was 14,500. (View at http://www.carcomplaints.com/Kia/Sedona/2006/brakes/service_brakes_air-disc-rotor.shtml#1)
 
 
Vehicle Make Model, Model Year(s) KIA SEDONA 2006
Manufacturer: Kia Motors Corporation
Vehicle Identification No. (VIN): Sedona
Summary:
The contact owns a 2006 Kia Sedona LX. While driving in the driveway 5 mph, the contact stated that the front passenger side bushings began to exhibit and abnormal squealing. The vehicle was taken to the dealer who informed the contact that they could not replace the bushings until they had fractured and could not press out from the sub frame without causing damaging. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was called who contacted the dealer to determine the failure and what could be done to repair the vehicle. The dealer informed the manufacturer that they would not repair the failure until it was fractured. The failure mileage was 24,400. (View at http://www.carcomplaints.com/Kia/Sedona/2006/suspension/suspension.shtml#4)
Date of Complaint: 12/15/2007
Component(s): Suspension, Control Arm, Tires 
Vehicle Make Model, Model Year(s) “KIA SEDONA 2006”
Manufacturer: Kia Motors Corporation
Vehicle Identification No. (VIN): Sedona LX 3.8L
 
Summary:
Note: My biggest beef is the fact that I can't keep tires on this vehicle. One of the problems is the rear camber is excessive on both rear wheels. I haven't been able to find an after market kit to just adj camber. Only the toe and camber kit o/e. Rear tires cup in less than ten thousand miles. Also fuel mpg average 17.5 not at all what I was told I would get. (View at http://www.carcomplaints.com/Kia/Sedona/2006/suspension/premature_tire_wear.shtml#1)
 
Date of Complaint: 09/29/2013
Component(s): Suspension, Control Arm, Tires 
Vehicle Make Model, Model Year(s) KIA SEDONA 2006 
Manufacturer: Kia Motors Corporation
Vehicle Identification No. (VIN): Sedona LX 3.8L V6
Summary:
We purchased this vehicle used in January 2013. It passed NH safety inspection when purchased and again in early August at its annual inspection. On September 29, as my wife was making a slow speed right turn into a parking lot, there was a loud rubbing noise and it shook violently. After having it towed to the service center, it was found that the left front control arm had rusted and failed. While it was scary enough to have this happen a slow speed, I cringe at what would have happened if it had failed on the highway, as we were supposed to be on the Interstate that morning with a full van including 2-3 children. Luckily we changed our plans earlier in the week and decided not to make the trip. I will be notifying the manufacturer and NHTSA about this. Seeing how there have been other instances of this problem, and similar problems on other Hyundia/Kia vehicles, I feel that they should look into this and issue the appropriate resolution. I have been driving for 35 years and have owned a lot of vehicles older and with more mileage
www.carcomplaints.com/Kia/Sedona/2006/suspension/broken_front_control_arm.shtml#1)
 
 
Law Office of Howard A. Gutman
230 Route 206, Suite 307
Flanders, New Jersey 07836
(973) 598-1980 (tel), (973) 531-4110 (fax)
New York Office
315 Madison Avenue, Suite 901
New York, New York 10165
howardgutman@aol.com (free consultation on lemon law claims)  

 

Thursday, December 5, 2013

Land Rover Freelander Head Gasket and Engine Problems


 

The Land Rover Freelander have had serious problems of head gasket malfunction which will lead to engine failure.  First signs of a problem include coolant leak, overheating, and engine performance problems.  This will usually lead to the engine failure which characterizes the 2002- 2005, model years of the Land Rover Freelander manufactured with the KV6 2.5 liter aluminum V6 engine.  Owners may be entitled to compensation.  Here is a more technical overview.  

Design and Components of the Vehicle

 
This engine is referred to as an aluminum V6 engine because it is manufactured using an aluminum cylinder block along with aluminum cylinder heads. Many internal components are however made of steel and iron. Most automotive manufacturers today offer aluminum V6 engines that would fall under this description. The KV6 engine shares several technical features with other manufacturer’s aluminum V6 engines of the 2002-2003 period such as double overhead camshafts, four valves per cylinder design cylinder heads, and variable intake manifold tuning.

 

One distinct design feature of the KV6 engine that makes it different from common aluminum V6 engines is the use of slip fit steel cylinder sleeves (or liners) in it's construction. All of the aluminum V6 engines that I have been exposed to (from Chrysler, Ford, GM, Honda, and others) use a press fit cast iron cylinder sleeve. Typically, engines using the cast iron cylinder sleeve design have demonstrated virtually no issues related to the sleeves or their integrity as assembled in the aluminum cylinder block. This is not the case with the KV6 engine design. I discovered an alarming number of reports describing failures (head gaskets and engine seizures) related to the sleeves of the KV6 engine.

 

Typically when aluminum cylinder block-iron sleeve engines are manufactured, the cylinder bores of the aluminum block are slightly smaller than the outside diameter of the cast iron sleeves before assembly at room temperature. This difference in sizes is referred to as interference and won’t allow assembly while the block and sleeves are both at room temperature. The block is heated to over 600 degrees F to allow it to fully expand before the cool or room temperature sleeves are pressed (forced) into place within the block and then allowed to cool at a controlled rate as an assembly. The amount of force used to press the sleeves into the block varies with designs and can be from a few hundred pounds to a few thousand pounds. This process assures a permanent, unchanging fitment of the sleeves to the cylinder block.

 

With the Freelander engine the sleeves are simply slipped into place as the engine is assembled. The sleeves of the Freelander engine have a shoulder machined into them about midway down the outside of the sleeves which rests on a machined land within the cylinder bores of the engine block as the engine is assembled. The sleeves essentially have two outside diameters with the lower end being smaller than the upper. It would be critical that these machined surfaces be of high quality and precision as once assembled, the contact area of the two surfaces would have to provide a seal between the coolant jacket of the cylinder block and the engine crankcase where the engine oil is collected and stored in the engine oil pan. The Freelander engine design relies on the clamping force of the cylinder head and gasket of the assembled engine to maintain a tension against the sleeves from the top to ensure a seal at the two machined surfaces described. The cylinder head gaskets are manufactured with a metal compression seal ring that is mated to the tops of the sleeves and these compression seal rings have a designed, calculated "crush" that upon assembly, ensure a permanent seal between the high temperature and pressure combustion gases, and the separate coolant and oil circulation passages of the assembled cylinder block and heads. It is important to note that the tops of the sleeves of the Freelander engine are designed to be flush with the head gasket surface of the cylinder block when assembled so that the head gasket will perform it's purpose of sealing effectively.

 

Incidence of Engine Failure

 

Many head gasket failures have been reported on the Freelander engine on the vehicle and it has been determined that this has been commonly caused by a condition where a cylinder sleeve (or sleeves) has "dropped" in the engine block (meaning that the top of the sleeve has moved below flush with the head gasket surface of the block). The condition occurred often enough that Land Rover issued a bulletin (Technical Bulletin #0036, dated June 16, 2004) for it's dealership technicians to provide a process for inspection and evaluation when a vehicle came in for repair. Though this bulletin also addresses an overheat condition diagnosis and repair, engine overheating often accompanies head gasket failure. The head gasket would have failed primarily because the tension of the crushed compression seal ring would be compromised as the sleeve moved lower into the block and away from the cylinder head, ultimately allowing coolant intrusion into the combustion chamber and combustion gases into the cooling system. This loss of tension against a cylinder sleeve would also compromise the sealing effectiveness of the aforementioned machined surfaces of the sleeve and cylinder block and allow coolant intrusion into the crankcase and engine oil, and thus causing catastrophic engine failure as the lubricating qualities of the engine oil are severely diminished when antifreeze coolant is mixed with it. 

 
Mechanism and dangers of engine failure


This would explain another common concern with the Freelander engine where the engines have seized (locked up), often times while driving. The reason that the sleeves drop in the block seems to be apparent and easy to understand. There are two basic principles at work in this issue. First, there is a significant difference in the thermal properties of steel and aluminum, and second, the steel cylinder sleeves are substantially harder than the alloy aluminum cylinder block they are fitted to.  Aluminum expands and contracts at a greater rate and degree than steel when heated and cooled.  In the normal life of an automotive engine there are an incredible number of these heating and cooling cycles- ie: cold start up to normal operating temperature and then cool down when shut off, occasional high work loads from trailer towing, climbing long grades in extreme weather conditions, etc. After enough of these cycles, the precision machined surfaces of the relatively soft aluminum cylinder block that relate to the fitment of the much harder steel sleeve would understandably be compromised as the aluminum is moving quicker and more than the steel in the process of thermal expansion and contraction. Add to this the fact that as the engine is running, pistons are moving up and down within the sleeves at a high rate of speed with some friction (normal-from the way that they are designed to fit within the sleeve), pushing up on the sleeve as the piston rises and then pulling down on the sleeve as the piston descends. This can effectively cause the hard steel sleeve to "hammer" against the machined surfaces within the bores of the softer aluminum cylinder block. Theses actions could be expected to cause the machined surfaces within the block to deteriorate and/or damaged to a point of failure.  This helps to explain why the sleeves drop in the cylinder block, causing head gasket failure and even catastrophic engine failure.  If this occurs in traffic, mechanical features such power braking will not function.  Stopping and maneuvering the vehicle particularly in traffic become a serious problem, and the condition poses dangers to the driver, occupants, and other vehicles. 

                                          
 
Law Office of Howard A. Gutman
230 Route 206, Suite 307
Flanders, New Jersey 07836
(973) 598-1980 (tel), (973) 531-4110 (fax)

New York Office
315 Madison Avenue, Suite 901
New York, New York 10165   Free consultation on Land Rover Defect Claims
howardgutman@aol.com


Monday, November 25, 2013

Third Party Warranty Fraud

We receive a number of complaint about warranty companies.  They offer to provide the comfort of covering repair costs but consumers are frequently enmeshed in problems and disputes, as they ask for expensive diagnosis before undertaking repair, suggest junkyard parts instead of new ones, pay for only partial costs, delay, and contradict the promises in their brochures.  

Edmunds writes,

"Third-party extended-warranty companies promise to offer peace of mind in the event that your vehicle breaks down. But all too often, their shady practices scam people out of their money instead of giving them real coverage when they need it. Not every extended auto warranty company is out to rip you off, but over the course of our research, we found that the honest ones are few and far between.

What Is a Third-Party Auto Warranty?
A third-party warranty is so named because it has no direct business relationship with the product it covers. In this case, that's your car. These warranties differ vastly from manufacturer extended warranties, which use original parts and factory-trained technicians to repair your vehicle at a dealership.  Third-party warranty companies may give you the option to take your car into the dealership, but the reimbursement process can be a hassle if a company doesn't want to cover a part." 

Nissan Pathfinder and Infiniti Brake Problems

Some owners of newer Pathfinders and Infinitis have reported brake problems which Nissan attributed to a problem at one facility.  Owners of vehicles with problems may be entitled to compensation for vehicle problems and repair costs.   

 

Edmunds reports, Nissan is recalling 19,258 2013 Nissan Pathfinders and Infiniti JX35s to fix a brake problem, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

"The front brake torque member was improperly cast, resulting in structural weakness," said NHTSA in its summary of the problem. "This can lead to premature failure and cracking. If the brake torque member fails, the brake caliper may move and contact the inside of the road wheel, resulting in reduced braking and increasing the risk of a crash."

The affected vehicles were built from December 3, 2012 through January 29, 2013 at Nissan's Smyrna, Tennessee plant.

Nissan told federal safety regulators it received a field report on March 1 involving a front brake torque member failure on a 2013 Pathfinder. Following that report, Nissan placed a yard hold on all potentially affected vehicles at the plant while a supplier investigation was conducted.

"Detailed analysis of the failed front brake torque member revealed that the casting was out of specification due to a 'cold shut' condition which occurred during the supplier's manufacturing process," Nissan said in documentation filed with NHTSA. "A small amount of molten iron flowed into an adjacent mold prematurely, and did not fuse properly with the newly introduced metal due to temperature loss."

Sunday, November 24, 2013

Range Rover Suspension Problems

Land Rover Range Rover owners have experienced suspension problems Owners have reported suspension problems while driving, air spring problems, and loss of pressure.  Here are some typical problems.  Owners may be entitled to compensation for repair costs, inconvenience, and loss of use.  

Vehicle Identification No. (VIN): Not Available

SUMMARY:
DRIVING AT 35 MPH ON A SLIGHTLY SLOPE BLVD. THE 2004 RANGE ROVER EXPERIENCE A SUDDEN LACK OF CONTROL BY DRIVER. IMMEDIATELY FELT RANGE ROVER WEAVE SLIGHTLY OUT OF CONTROL AND REAR END DIPPING DOWNWARD. THE DRIVER HAD TO REACT QUICKLY TO COMPENSATE AND REGAIN CONTROL TO CONTINUE DRIVING SAFELY. IMMEDIATELY CONTACTED (OTHER-FOREIGN) REPAIR SHOP AND DROVE 5 MINUTES TO SHOP. SHOP ASE TECH DIAGNOSIS PROBLEM AS ABS CONTROL MODULE FAILED. REASON FOR SPONTANEOUS AIR SUSPENSION LIFTS TO VEHICLE WHEN SITTING IN TRAFFIC. TECH NOTES: FAILURE WITH AIR SUSPENSION WILL CAUSE VEHICLE TO LEAN (OFF BALANCE) AND MAY CREATE HAZARDOUS DRIVING CONDITIONS. ABS CONTROL MODULE COST TO REPAIR $2,000. - $2,500 FURTHER DIAGNOSTIC NEEDED TO DETERMINE POSSIBLE OTHER RELATED ISSUES TO SPONTANEOUS AIR SUSPENSION LIFTING. IF FOUND LEAKAGE OF SUSPENSION AIRBAGS, EACH AIR BAG APPROXIMATELY $600 EACH ON REAR SUSPENSION. OWNERS FEELS THIS IS AN OBVIOUS AND WELL KNOWN PROBLEM WITH RANGE ROVERS (AND OTHER LANDROVER MODELS) WHICH THE MANUFACTURER IS IGNORING. OWNER FEEL MANUFACTURER CONTINUANCE TO NOT ADDRESSING THE ISSUE MAY CAUSE GRAVE INQUIRY IF AND WHEN SUSPENSION FAILS WHILE DRIVING. *TR
     

Date Complaint Filed: 11/19/2011
Component(s): ELECTRICAL SYSTEM , SUSPENSION , WHEELS
Date of Incident: 01/25/2010
NHTSA ID Number: 10436446
                           
    

 Manufacturer: LAND ROVER


Date Complaint Filed: 12/28/2010
Component(s): SUSPENSION
Date of Incident: 12/27/2010
NHTSA ID Number: 10372687

    

Date of Incident: 06/22/2009
NHTSA ID Number: 10291975

 Vehicle MakeModelModel Year(s)

Thursday, November 21, 2013

MULTIPLE VEHICLE PROBLEMS IN A LEMON LAW CLAIM



Salmagundi on offer is not the shortcut it appears to be

"If you could eat the kitchen sink, that's what you'd get when you order Salmagundi. Salmagundi is a salad dish, originating in the early 17th century in England, comprising cooked meats, seafood, vegetables, fruit, leaves, nuts and flowers and dressed with oil, vinegar and spices.  Here's the thing: there are very few people willing to cross the street, spread the word or pay extra for all of the above.  Better to pick just one thing you can be proud of, rather than offering just about everything in an attempt to please just about everyone (and thus no one). "  See Seth Blodin blog. 






    In a lemon law claim, pick no more than 1-2 problems,  and show their seriousness and impact.











Law Office of Howard A. Gutman
230 Route 206, Suite 307
Flanders, New Jersey 07836
(973) 598-1980 (tel) 
(973) 531-4110 (fax) 

New York Office 
315 Madison Avenue, Suite 901 
New York, New York 10017 
howardgutman@aol.com 
www.lemonlawclaims.com