Monday, December 16, 2013

Ford F150 Acceleration Problem


 

 

 

 

 

The NHTSA is investigating complaints of sharp reducti acceleration issues and loss of power for owners of 2011-2013 Ford F-150 trucks with the 3.5L GTDI engine. This engine is the V-6 EcoBoost engine.  


Date Complaint Filed: 12/10/2013

Component(s): UNKNOWN OR OTHER

Date of Incident: 08/14/2012

NHTSA Number: 10555429

FORD F-150 2012 

Manufacturer: Ford Motor Company

Vehicle Identification No. (VIN):  1FTFW1ET9CF...

SUMMARY:

ON THREE DIFFERENT OCCASIONS WAS IN THE PROCESS OF PASSING A VEHICLE, AND ALL OF A SUDDEN LOST ENGINE ACCELERATION, PICK UP BEGAN TO VIBRATE, PULLED OVER AND CALLED SERVICE CENTER, WAS TOLD TO TURN OFF AND RESTART VEHICLE, PROCEEDED TO DESTINATION!

Date Complaint Filed: 12/08/2013

Component(s): ENGINE

Date of Incident: 11/11/2013

NHTSA ID Number: 10555212

Vehicle Make Model Model Year(s)

•FORD F-150 2013                      

 Manufacturer: Ford Motor Company

Vehicle Identification No. (VIN):  1FTFW1ET8CF...

SUMMARY:

UPON ACCELERATION TO PASS ON FREEWAY, ENGINE SHUDDERS AND LOSES POWER. TRANSMISSION DOWN SHIFTED TO TRY TO RECOVER, BUT ENGINE WOULD NOT RESPOND TO THROTTLE PRESS. HAD TO BACK OFF ON THROTTLE AND MOVE TO RIGHT LANE ALL THE WHILE THINKING TO TAKE THE TRUCK TO THE SHOULDER. VERY SCARY WHEN TRYING TO PASS AND NO POWER. LUCKILY I WAS NOT REAR ENDED FOR SLOWING DOWN SO FAST!

Complaint Filed: 12/03/2013

Component(s): ENGINE , POWER TRAIN

Date of Incident: 02/01/2012

NHTSA ID Number: 10554605            

Vehicle Make Model Model Year(s)

FORDF-1502011

Manufacturer: Ford Motor Company

Vehicle Identification No. (VIN):  1FTFW1ET0BF...

SUMMARY:

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 FORD F-150. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING AT APPROXIMATELY 55 MPH, THE ACCELERATOR FAILED TO RESPOND TO ACCELERATION ATTEMPTS. ADDITIONALLY, AN ERROR CODE (P0036) AND THE CHECK ENGINE WARNING LIGHT ILLUMINATED. THE CONTACT ALSO MENTIONED THAT THE VEHICLE FAILED TO OPERATE NORMALLY WHEN DRIVING IN RAINY WEATHER. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A DEALER BUT WAS NOT ABLE TO BE DIAGNOSED. THE TECHNICIAN WAS UNABLE TO DETERMINE THE CAUSE OF THE FAILURE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 3,500. 

Date Complaint Filed: 12/03/2013

Component(s): ENGINE

Date of Incident: 08/02/2010

NHTSA ID Number: 10554601       

Vehicle Make Model Model Year Ford F150 Acceleration issues

FORD F-150 2011

 Manufacturer: Ford Motor Company

 Vehicle Identification No. (VIN):  1FTFW1ET4BF...

SUMMARY:

SOMETIMES WHEN I TRY TO PASS THE ENGINE DURING FULL ACCELERATION STUMBLES AND LOOSES ACCELERATION. IT DOES NOT HAPPEN ALL THE TIME AND DOES NOT

Friday, December 6, 2013

Kia Sedona brake, suspension and electronic stability problems

 Owners of the Kia Sedona have had brake, suspension and stability problems and may be  entitled to compensation.  Enclosed are reports.  


 

Date of Complaint: 08/29/2011

Component(s): Brakes, Electronic Stability Control, Parking Brake, Indicator Light, Air Disc Rotor 

Vehicle Make Model, Model Year(s) KIA SEDONA 2006 

Manufacturer: Kia Motors Corporation

Vehicle Identification No. (VIN): Sedona 6-cyl 

Summary:

The contact stated that when the brake was applied, the vehicle would shake violently. The vehicle was taken to the dealer several times for the failure. The dealer replaced the rotors, but the failure was not corrected. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure and advised the contact to take the vehicle back to the dealer. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure mileage was 50,000 and the current mileage was 80,000. (View at http://www.carcomplaints.com/Kia/Sedona/2006/brakes/service_brakes_hydraulic.shtml#12)

Date of Complaint: 09/01/2013

Component(s): Brakes, Electronic Stability Control, Parking Brake, Indicator Light, Air Disc Rotor

Vehicle Make Model, Model Year(s) “KIA SEDONA 2006”

Manufacturer: Kia Motors Corporation

Vehicle Identification No. (VIN): Sedona

Summary:

The contact stated that the air bag and esc warning lights illuminated. The vehicle was taken to the dealer for diagnosis. The technician stated that the computer in the front driver or passenger's side seat would have to be replaced. The technician was unable to guarantee the repair after replacing the part. The vehicle was not repaired. The VIN was not available. The approximate failure mileage was 60,000. (View at http://www.carcomplaints.com/Kia/Sedona/2006/brakes/electronic_stability_control.shtml#8)

Date of Complaint: 06/22/2007

Component(s): Brakes, Electronic Stability Control, Parking Brake, Indicator Light, Air Disc Rotor

Vehicle Make Model, Model Year(s) “KIA SEDONA 2006”

Manufacturer: Kia Motors Corporation

Vehicle Identification No. (VIN): Sedona 6-cyl

Summary:

While driving 75 mph, the entire steering column shook when the contact applied the brakes. He pulled off the freeway and noticed the front wheel rims were extremely hot. He waited for them to cool off and drove home. The vehicle operates normally when driving 40-55 mph. The dealer stated that the rotors may be bent or warped. The VIN was unavailable. The current mileage is 15,000 and failure mileage was 14,500. (View at http://www.carcomplaints.com/Kia/Sedona/2006/brakes/service_brakes_air-disc-rotor.shtml#1)
 
 
Vehicle Make Model, Model Year(s) KIA SEDONA 2006
Manufacturer: Kia Motors Corporation
Vehicle Identification No. (VIN): Sedona
Summary:
The contact owns a 2006 Kia Sedona LX. While driving in the driveway 5 mph, the contact stated that the front passenger side bushings began to exhibit and abnormal squealing. The vehicle was taken to the dealer who informed the contact that they could not replace the bushings until they had fractured and could not press out from the sub frame without causing damaging. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was called who contacted the dealer to determine the failure and what could be done to repair the vehicle. The dealer informed the manufacturer that they would not repair the failure until it was fractured. The failure mileage was 24,400. (View at http://www.carcomplaints.com/Kia/Sedona/2006/suspension/suspension.shtml#4)
Date of Complaint: 12/15/2007
Component(s): Suspension, Control Arm, Tires 
Vehicle Make Model, Model Year(s) “KIA SEDONA 2006”
Manufacturer: Kia Motors Corporation
Vehicle Identification No. (VIN): Sedona LX 3.8L
 
Summary:
Note: My biggest beef is the fact that I can't keep tires on this vehicle. One of the problems is the rear camber is excessive on both rear wheels. I haven't been able to find an after market kit to just adj camber. Only the toe and camber kit o/e. Rear tires cup in less than ten thousand miles. Also fuel mpg average 17.5 not at all what I was told I would get. (View at http://www.carcomplaints.com/Kia/Sedona/2006/suspension/premature_tire_wear.shtml#1)
 
Date of Complaint: 09/29/2013
Component(s): Suspension, Control Arm, Tires 
Vehicle Make Model, Model Year(s) KIA SEDONA 2006 
Manufacturer: Kia Motors Corporation
Vehicle Identification No. (VIN): Sedona LX 3.8L V6
Summary:
We purchased this vehicle used in January 2013. It passed NH safety inspection when purchased and again in early August at its annual inspection. On September 29, as my wife was making a slow speed right turn into a parking lot, there was a loud rubbing noise and it shook violently. After having it towed to the service center, it was found that the left front control arm had rusted and failed. While it was scary enough to have this happen a slow speed, I cringe at what would have happened if it had failed on the highway, as we were supposed to be on the Interstate that morning with a full van including 2-3 children. Luckily we changed our plans earlier in the week and decided not to make the trip. I will be notifying the manufacturer and NHTSA about this. Seeing how there have been other instances of this problem, and similar problems on other Hyundia/Kia vehicles, I feel that they should look into this and issue the appropriate resolution. I have been driving for 35 years and have owned a lot of vehicles older and with more mileage
www.carcomplaints.com/Kia/Sedona/2006/suspension/broken_front_control_arm.shtml#1)
 
 
Law Office of Howard A. Gutman
230 Route 206, Suite 307
Flanders, New Jersey 07836
(973) 598-1980 (tel), (973) 531-4110 (fax)
New York Office
315 Madison Avenue, Suite 901
New York, New York 10165
howardgutman@aol.com (free consultation on lemon law claims)  

 

Thursday, December 5, 2013

Land Rover Freelander Head Gasket and Engine Problems


 

The Land Rover Freelander have had serious problems of head gasket malfunction which will lead to engine failure.  First signs of a problem include coolant leak, overheating, and engine performance problems.  This will usually lead to the engine failure which characterizes the 2002- 2005, model years of the Land Rover Freelander manufactured with the KV6 2.5 liter aluminum V6 engine.  Owners may be entitled to compensation.  Here is a more technical overview.  

Design and Components of the Vehicle

 
This engine is referred to as an aluminum V6 engine because it is manufactured using an aluminum cylinder block along with aluminum cylinder heads. Many internal components are however made of steel and iron. Most automotive manufacturers today offer aluminum V6 engines that would fall under this description. The KV6 engine shares several technical features with other manufacturer’s aluminum V6 engines of the 2002-2003 period such as double overhead camshafts, four valves per cylinder design cylinder heads, and variable intake manifold tuning.

 

One distinct design feature of the KV6 engine that makes it different from common aluminum V6 engines is the use of slip fit steel cylinder sleeves (or liners) in it's construction. All of the aluminum V6 engines that I have been exposed to (from Chrysler, Ford, GM, Honda, and others) use a press fit cast iron cylinder sleeve. Typically, engines using the cast iron cylinder sleeve design have demonstrated virtually no issues related to the sleeves or their integrity as assembled in the aluminum cylinder block. This is not the case with the KV6 engine design. I discovered an alarming number of reports describing failures (head gaskets and engine seizures) related to the sleeves of the KV6 engine.

 

Typically when aluminum cylinder block-iron sleeve engines are manufactured, the cylinder bores of the aluminum block are slightly smaller than the outside diameter of the cast iron sleeves before assembly at room temperature. This difference in sizes is referred to as interference and won’t allow assembly while the block and sleeves are both at room temperature. The block is heated to over 600 degrees F to allow it to fully expand before the cool or room temperature sleeves are pressed (forced) into place within the block and then allowed to cool at a controlled rate as an assembly. The amount of force used to press the sleeves into the block varies with designs and can be from a few hundred pounds to a few thousand pounds. This process assures a permanent, unchanging fitment of the sleeves to the cylinder block.

 

With the Freelander engine the sleeves are simply slipped into place as the engine is assembled. The sleeves of the Freelander engine have a shoulder machined into them about midway down the outside of the sleeves which rests on a machined land within the cylinder bores of the engine block as the engine is assembled. The sleeves essentially have two outside diameters with the lower end being smaller than the upper. It would be critical that these machined surfaces be of high quality and precision as once assembled, the contact area of the two surfaces would have to provide a seal between the coolant jacket of the cylinder block and the engine crankcase where the engine oil is collected and stored in the engine oil pan. The Freelander engine design relies on the clamping force of the cylinder head and gasket of the assembled engine to maintain a tension against the sleeves from the top to ensure a seal at the two machined surfaces described. The cylinder head gaskets are manufactured with a metal compression seal ring that is mated to the tops of the sleeves and these compression seal rings have a designed, calculated "crush" that upon assembly, ensure a permanent seal between the high temperature and pressure combustion gases, and the separate coolant and oil circulation passages of the assembled cylinder block and heads. It is important to note that the tops of the sleeves of the Freelander engine are designed to be flush with the head gasket surface of the cylinder block when assembled so that the head gasket will perform it's purpose of sealing effectively.

 

Incidence of Engine Failure

 

Many head gasket failures have been reported on the Freelander engine on the vehicle and it has been determined that this has been commonly caused by a condition where a cylinder sleeve (or sleeves) has "dropped" in the engine block (meaning that the top of the sleeve has moved below flush with the head gasket surface of the block). The condition occurred often enough that Land Rover issued a bulletin (Technical Bulletin #0036, dated June 16, 2004) for it's dealership technicians to provide a process for inspection and evaluation when a vehicle came in for repair. Though this bulletin also addresses an overheat condition diagnosis and repair, engine overheating often accompanies head gasket failure. The head gasket would have failed primarily because the tension of the crushed compression seal ring would be compromised as the sleeve moved lower into the block and away from the cylinder head, ultimately allowing coolant intrusion into the combustion chamber and combustion gases into the cooling system. This loss of tension against a cylinder sleeve would also compromise the sealing effectiveness of the aforementioned machined surfaces of the sleeve and cylinder block and allow coolant intrusion into the crankcase and engine oil, and thus causing catastrophic engine failure as the lubricating qualities of the engine oil are severely diminished when antifreeze coolant is mixed with it. 

 
Mechanism and dangers of engine failure


This would explain another common concern with the Freelander engine where the engines have seized (locked up), often times while driving. The reason that the sleeves drop in the block seems to be apparent and easy to understand. There are two basic principles at work in this issue. First, there is a significant difference in the thermal properties of steel and aluminum, and second, the steel cylinder sleeves are substantially harder than the alloy aluminum cylinder block they are fitted to.  Aluminum expands and contracts at a greater rate and degree than steel when heated and cooled.  In the normal life of an automotive engine there are an incredible number of these heating and cooling cycles- ie: cold start up to normal operating temperature and then cool down when shut off, occasional high work loads from trailer towing, climbing long grades in extreme weather conditions, etc. After enough of these cycles, the precision machined surfaces of the relatively soft aluminum cylinder block that relate to the fitment of the much harder steel sleeve would understandably be compromised as the aluminum is moving quicker and more than the steel in the process of thermal expansion and contraction. Add to this the fact that as the engine is running, pistons are moving up and down within the sleeves at a high rate of speed with some friction (normal-from the way that they are designed to fit within the sleeve), pushing up on the sleeve as the piston rises and then pulling down on the sleeve as the piston descends. This can effectively cause the hard steel sleeve to "hammer" against the machined surfaces within the bores of the softer aluminum cylinder block. Theses actions could be expected to cause the machined surfaces within the block to deteriorate and/or damaged to a point of failure.  This helps to explain why the sleeves drop in the cylinder block, causing head gasket failure and even catastrophic engine failure.  If this occurs in traffic, mechanical features such power braking will not function.  Stopping and maneuvering the vehicle particularly in traffic become a serious problem, and the condition poses dangers to the driver, occupants, and other vehicles. 

                                          
 
Law Office of Howard A. Gutman
230 Route 206, Suite 307
Flanders, New Jersey 07836
(973) 598-1980 (tel), (973) 531-4110 (fax)

New York Office
315 Madison Avenue, Suite 901
New York, New York 10165   Free consultation on Land Rover Defect Claims
howardgutman@aol.com